Saturday, September 19, 2009

Is it easy being green?

The other day I won a blog contest hosted by Alberta Views magazine through their blog. The prize was a gift basket put together by Bullfrog Power. Bullfrog is a company that sells power in certain Canadian provinces that is generated 100% from wind power. The basket is quite nice, filled with items promoting Bullfrog and other green enterprises. It also included a $25 gift certificate for 1 month of power from Bullfrog. Besides the fact that I'm not really sure that $25 bucks is going to cut it for my power bill (and I live in a condo - my power consumption is not that high), I'm really not sure if I'm going to run out and switch my eletrical provider.

I subscribe to what I consider to be a 'general green philosophy'. Some would probably consider it 'green lite'. I believe we only have one planet and we should do our best to care for it. But we also need to use what is on it. I don't believe we should rape the planet for its resources, but we can use so much of what is available on this planet and the use of these resources provides us the foundation of our modern society. A very typical, centrist position to take. I love the outdoors. I love to go camping, hiking and exploring areas outside of our urban landscapes. Nature provides us with some awesome vistas to take in across this planet. I've made a point to discover as many as I can, be it here in Alberta or across the planet on another continent.

I sympathize with some of the green political positions. But I also cannot bring myself take on some of their more radical lifestyle changes. I walk to work (even in -30C) because it's more convienient for me to walk rather than pay a large amount for parking or a bus downtown while it is still quicker for me to walk. The fact that it cuts down on my carbon footprint is a bonus, but not the sole reason I walk to work. I drive a fuel efficient car because it was cheaper for me to buy it new than pay car payments on a vehicle that had no warranty. I also love the fact that my entire petrol budget for a month seldom exceeds $100 - and this includes trips to Red Deer and Calgary.

For me, I just cannot bring myself to stop eating meat because of the large carbon footprint cows emit from grazing to their journey to my supermarket's freezer. We were without a car last year for a month and it was difficult for the 3 of us to do much of anything that month. While fresh veggies do taste better than those I buy at my local produce store, I just don't have the space to cultivate my own garden. I also don't like pickle beans that much - so I will pay for those trucks to transport my vegetables from California and Mexico during the winter months so I can enjoy my veggies year round. I'm not going to boycott Shell or Esso because I still need the fuel they're selling so I can make those trips to my parents or my sister's.

My brother in law best demonstrates what I believe to be the most accessible green philosophy - He loves the outdoors and does everything he can to minimize his impact when he takes a trip to go camping, boating or whatever activity he picks for the weekend. He recycles what he can in a city with a limited recylcing program. But he drives an F150 to carry said boat and camping supplies.

Protecting the planet is important but our society cannot abandon their cars, power plants and plastics. Green action needs to be accessible. There are practical things we can all do, and some of these actions have economic benefits. I would vote for candidates who espoused green philosophies if their proposals were practical to implement. I think green candidates would have more success if they would work to get the vote of someone like my brother in law or the farmer in Rimbey who is ticked off with radiation emitting power lines being strung over his farm. Instead the green candidates focus on the fact that their campaign brochures are printed on recycled paper and take train rides instead of plane rides to carry on their campaign message. This doesn't make them accessible to the average voter and keeps them irrelevant - at both the federal and provincial level.

I still haven't decided if it makes sense for me to switch my power from Epcor to Bullfrog. My power bill is expensive enough right now. And besides, I'm not sold on the fact that wind power is an economical method to generate electricity. It takes thousands of turbines to generate anything close to power generation of a fossil fuel run plant. While I think it is a good thing to use the turbines to relieve some pressure off our fossil fuel plants, it just won't work out to replace them all. In the last 10 years there has been some very interesting developments in other generation methods. I will continue to keep my eye on those methods and who knows, maybe Bullfrog will tap into one of those methods to help with it's supply in 5 or 10 years. And then I won't even need a coupon to help me make the switch.

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

leadership and an astronaut on EVA


I was at a seminar today as part of a leadership program I am doing with work. In the first activity they asked us to pick an image that best described why we are taking the leadership program. The picture above was one of the images so I took it almost immediately. There are so many reasons why this describes my reasons for taking the leadership course that I couldn't share them all in the 1 minute that was provided in my group. This image works on so many levels for me that I thought I'd share some more thoughts.

Since I was a child I dreamed of being an Astronaut. I even went to space camp down in Kansas - 3 times. For someone with an over active imagination, space represents the frontier of one's imagination - there is no limit what you can imagine in space. So while I may have moved on with my dreams to become an Astronaut, my imagination has not. I still keep up on the news about the space program, I still track down and read good sci-fi, every so often I even try and write something about it.

Leadership is all about pushing the limits. And an Astronaut on an EVA* in a MMU** certainly pushes all boundaries currently known to man. And this image represents something a little more materialistic as well - this man has gone about as high as anyone can go. I am currently near the bottom of my organization. I hope to learn the skills and prove myself so that I can advance and move up in this organization. This will of course take time.

An Astronaut is a highly trained scientist and are often the top researchers, engineers and pilots in the world. This picture respresents years of training and research. And while we only see one person in this photo, literally thousands of people are responsible for making this one spacewalk possible. Only this photo was taken in a vacuum, the achievements of many are represented in the photo. A successful leader must work with and have the backing of the people he or she led in order to achieve what he or she sets out to achieve.

As a kid, I knew the name of the Astronaut in this photo. I had to look it up tonight. Few people will know the name of Bruce McCandless but most will recoginize this photo. The same applies to leadership - the results of a leader will often be known rather than the name of the individual. From developing a new social program, to designing additions to a city to educating and mobilizing the public on an important social issue, we don't often remember the names of the leaders who led us, but we will remember their achievements. Not all of us can Barak Obama or Jim Ballsillie - but leaders from any level in an organization can achieve great things.

So I hope as I start my career and complete this leadership program I can learn something from those who have went before me and help to bring about some positive change - somewhere. It will take time and discipline, but I believe it will be worth it.


Monday, August 17, 2009

This blog took a different direction than I origanily started with

So there it is, there's the confession. And somehow a 30 year old with a comic book fetish doesn't seem unusual. Afterall, comic books have developed into a diverse and mature medium. They encompass everything from Archie's and anime to very dark and disturbing pieces like Sandman or Swamp Thing.

My preference is for superhero comics. When I was a teenager I collected Batman and X-men (I was collecting during Marvel's Age of Apocalypse). But then my comic book store closed and I quit buying. My interest was rekindled strangely enough when I was in Vietnam. A co-worker was also an avid reader and he introduced to a lot of good stories. I don't get much opportunity to read, but I try to keep on top of what is happening.

Some comics are good, others are not. I've reread some of the stuff I read as a kid and its all of varying quality. But during my comic education in Vietnam I was introduced to some solid writers. As the readership grew up, so did the writers. Now there was some good writing back in the 80's and 90's but there was certainly a bias towards big boobs. Now, the boobs have become realistic as the expectations of the read have shifted.

I want something to capture my imagination and take me on a journey. This applies to the books I read, to the games I play and to the TV I watch. This is why I enjoy comic books - a world is crafted for me to explore and then tells me a story. After I finish I can think 'what a world that was, I wonder...'

I'm a very creative person. I create new worlds often. Or I use the worlds others have created and think of my own stories. I seldom write anything - I just play itout in my during my walks or at bedtime. I try to improve on comic book worlds that others have created or even just try and start with a fresh canvas. But there is a wealth of creativity out there. I hope in the next few years that I can continue reading comic books and maybe, just maybe I can start to put down some of my ideas down onto some sort of medium. I have a hundred ideas, some are developed over an afternoon's walk, others have been in development for a decade.



Wednesday, August 12, 2009

keeping interested

You know, I try to update my blog, I really do. I have 10-15 different ideas at any given time I want to put transmit into the blogosphere but when the time comes to writing them, I rather watch TV or read or do something else. Procastination has always been my worst enemy. That's one of the reasons I started this blog - so I can develop some discipline.

I was talking to my cousin this weekend and it amazed me how quickly he turned into a '30 year old' with all the weight, debt and kid problems that comes along with being in your 30's. This cousin is 6 months younger than me, so I have to stop asking myself why I don't get ID anymore. I did get ID a couple of weeks ago though - at a football game. But he got heck by the rest of guys working at the beer garden because all of the rest of them recognized me as the son of the 'deputy grand pooba' of the Knight's council at my parent's church. I don't fret age though - with age, we learn things and gain the experience to handle thing we could have handled before.

Work is busy. But it's not stressful - I know the material and I can apply it well. One lady called me today very upset. And she certainly had reason to be. She did everything correctly but she is probably still going to get rejected for funding just because of the way the system is set up. But I was able to explain things to her, calm her down and tell her why she was going to get rejected. I also presented one more alternative. I advised her that it probably wouldn't work, but at least she got a straight answer from someone. So often the client is told 'go to this office' and then told 'nope, not our problem, try this completely unrelated office' and then off to another office that really doesn't know what it is doing and then told to go back to where they started. And our office is no better - we don't make any decisions, so we still have to refer out. But we've made a point to know our material and to try and help the client the best we can.

Well, that should suffice as an update for today. I know it's really a bunch of nothing, but at least it's something.

Monday, July 20, 2009

Oil Sands vs Tar Sands - the postives

I posted a series of 3 blogs on the Oil Sands at www.titulia.com back in February of March this year. I origanily wrote this for an international audience, so it might seem basic to some.

In my last article I set up the negatives about Oil Sands development. In this article I want to discuss the benefits of exploiting the oil sands and why should be investing the billions while its creating so many problems.

Our society runs on fossil fuels. And we're at a point where everyone wants more. Often times people think of fossil fuels as the means to run our cars, but they are also the components in our cars, computers and cameras. Plastics and other items made from petro-chemicals are everywhere. As a fuel source there have been strides made to find alternatives, but it will take a while for these other fuel sources to be brought up to wide spread use and none of the these alternatives have the versatility of petroleum. And since plastic is everywhere (besides those everyone has cut out of their wallets since the financial crisis) I don't see how we can repudiate fossil fuels anytime soon.

The reserves in the oil sands are huge. According to the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers - http://www.capp.ca/canadaIndustry/oilSands/Pages/default.aspx - Canada has 179 billion barrels of oil in reserve, 173 of which is in the oil sands . Canada is second only to Saudi Arabia in provable reserves. Canada is already the largest supplier of petroleum to the United States. While most Canadians might snivle and whine about our government, it is measured by the World Bank as one of the most stable and least corrupt in world. The pipelines linking Canada and the USA are safe and well maintained. The shipping lanes in both the Atlantic and the Pacific are well patrolled and no one is hijacking oil tankers in these areas. The development is being undertaken while listening to the concerns of stakeholders. No one is being taken out 'round the shed and shot for their opposition to oil sands development. It is exactly this opposition to the oil sands that demonstrates that Canada has a fair and open democracy. This issue can be and is being discussed openly.

When you're talking billions in investment, this means billions put into jobs. And the jobs run the spectrum. From heavy equipment operators to engineers, from pipefitters to PhD's in chemistry, from administrative assistants to CEO's - its jobs jobs jobs. Until recently Alberta had an unemployment rate of 3.5% and the best labour market participation in Canada. Even now, our unemployment is at 5.8% - the third lowest in Canada (source: http://employment.alberta.ca/cps/rde/xchg/hre/hs.xsl/2599.html ). People flocked to Alberta to take advantage of this boom. The City of Fort McMurray had more Newfoundlanders at one point than any city in Newfoundland! (Newfoundland is the eastermost province in Canada) A journeyman welder in Nova Scotia could make $18 an hour 'back home' while making $40 (plus overtime) in Alberta. From permanent production jobs to temporary construction ones this created a lot of wealth for all Canadians.

An interesting counterpoint to some of the Aboriginal communities talking about the loss of their way of life. A positive program that did come out of the oil sands development was how the companies went into the schools of the Aborginal communities and recruited young people as apprentices in the trades after they finished high school. In the Alberta training system it means that in 4 years you'll be a journeyman(person) and have a ticket to practice your trade to practice your trade anywhere in Canada. Since the crash we haven't seen a giant jump in aborginal males under 30 being unemployed, at least not at rates different than the majority population. So this system of training these young men seems to have worked and has kept a lot employed in a culture that sees chronic unemployment.

With all the public scrutiny the oil sands have received, this means the companies and government are being watched closely. When the companies have violated the rules they have been punished because of it. The duck story I related to you in the last article has a happy ending - the company was charged for the death of the ducks. New policies are being put in place to ensure that the ducks don't take a swim in tailing ponds. The companies are being made to innovate. Instead of using fresh water for the processes they have found salt water aquifiers and used those instead. The water being released back into the water shed is tested to have no impurities. The government is pressuring the companies to invest in carbon reduction strartegies. There are plans to start charging for the carbon admitted under a revised carbon trading scheme. New technologies that don't use water to extract the bituman are being developed. There is a very innovative in-situ project that uses electricity to heat the bitumen rather than water.

Does this get government and the companies off the hook for the problems the development is causing? No. But it does demonstrate that with public pressure change can be made. Should development of a resource we all need be stopped because its 'dirty'? Not when there are other solutions.

Oil Sands vs Tar Sands - the negatives

I posted a series of 3 blogs on the Oil Sands at www.titulia.com back in February of March this year. I origanily wrote this for an international audience, so it might seem basic to some.

The oil sands are a large resource. They can help quench some of this thirst for some of the world for a few years (some say 20, others say a century, but that isn't the point of this article). But a lot of people say the cost is too high. There are grave environmental and social issues surrounding the oil sands. And a lot of people wonder if our thirst for fossil fuels is sustainable or are we just driving ourselves off a cliff by being so reliant on it.

The Environment
The environment is the problem that is getting the most press against oil sands development. Indeed, the problems appear staggering. Vast quantities of water are being used, the air is being pumped fill of greenhouse gasses, toxic waste is being bilged out across the landscape and large portions of boreal forest is being wiped out.

There are two methods to extract the bitumen from the ground. I don't really need to go into them here, but one method is strip mining and the other is in-situ drilling. In-situ drilling involves extracting the bitumen from the soil when it’s too far down to feasibly mine it. The most common method right now is to inject steam into a hole into ground that warms up the bitumen and causes it to flow through another hole. In the strip mining process, the bitumen is taken to a processing centre at the mine and refined using water so that it can flow through a pipeline. (I know I'm grossly simplifying both processes, but the process isn't the point of this article, check Wikipedia or other online resources for a more in depth look at the process if that interests you).

Both of these processes require large volumes of water. There is a fairly large watershed that surrounds the Athabasca Oil Sands, but many critics are saying that too much fresh water is being used. The water is also being pumped back into the water. Although the companies insist that the water has all oil sands impurities removed, there is evidence that this water is not as clean as it should be. The wildlife in this area is suffering and a community downstream of the oil sands development has very high cancer rates. In a time when much of world is suffering from water shortages it seems to be very short sighted to consume water for this industrial process when much of the world is starting to go thirsty. North Alberta (and Northern Canada) does have large fresh water reserves, but many are worried that these are being depleted because of this industrial development.

Most people are concerned about global warming. The citizens of all developed countries are demanding their governments do something about greenhouse gases. It would appear that the Government of Canada and Alberta are ignoring those concerns. Canada did ratify Kyoto in 2005 and agreed to cut its emissions by 5% below the levels it had in 1990 by 2012. In 2004 those levels had grown by 27% from 1990 levels! The energy exports of the oil sands play a role in this as does the extraction process. The machines used to mine the bitumen are the largest land vehicles in the world. They use an incredible amount of energy.

It doesn't help that they are also destroying large tracts of forest in order to mine the bitumen. Animals are losing habitat and the very things that can absorb the excess CO2 are being bulldozed. If you look at photos of an oil sands mine, you will see a very ugly strip mine. This was once very pristine and untouched wilderness, one of the last few places on the planet. Now the mines are an industrial wasteland.

Adding to this industrial wasteland is the toxic waste that comes from converting the bitumen into a product that can flow through a pipeline. This waste is being deposited into large tailing ponds. The tailing ponds have existed since they started mining the bitumen back in the late 60's. But they have recently gained much infamy when 500 migrating ducks landed in one two years ago. One duck managed to survive. Last year, a machine operator had his machine slide into a tailing pond. He didn't survive.

Social Issues
Such large operations do not come without its social costs. Before the oil sands, this area was home to a relatively high number of aboriginals who were still able to practice their traditional way of life. As the price of oil went up in the last few years, the development of the oil sands went at a feverish pitch. The City of Fort McMurray exploded overnight as people came searching for $40/hour jobs that a lot of people thought required little education. The infrastructure just wasn't ready for it.

The Aboriginals have been abused throughout Canadian history. From taking their land through unfair treaties to abhorrent living conditions on their reserves, the treatment of aboriginals is a black mark for Canada. There is a movement to correct these injustices, but it is taking a long time. Many of the aboriginal communities in the Fort McMurray region are very isolated. But they are feeling the pinch of the development. Water quality has deteriorated. The animals that they hunted to make a living off of are disappearing. The young people are leaving the reserves to try and cash in on the economic boom. Social networks are breaking down. Alcoholism and drug abuse are flourishing in these isolated communities. Some of the most vocal critics of the oil sands have been the aboriginal communities because they feel (yet again) that no one is listening to their concerns.

In 5 years (2001 - 2006) the population of the Fort McMurray grew from 41,000 to 51,000. This number does not count the large amount of temporary workers that were living at the construction camps between 2002 and 2007. A 25% spurt in population would be difficult for any community to handle. Fort McMurray went from being a sleepy little backwater mining/oil and gas town to being the economic hot spot in Canada. People came because they heard there were high paying jobs that required little education. There was certainly a demand for heavy equipment operators and other labourers, but there was also a need for skilled trades such as pipefitters and welders. People from across Canada flocked to Fort McMurray looking for these high paying jobs. It was the same as a gold rush. Everyone wanted to get their piece of the pie. Some were successful, others were not.

The town couldn't keep up. There was one main road in the town and the town is separated by a river. There is one bridge across this river. Tens of thousands of people needed to cross this river every day. There was a shortage of housing. People came to Fort McMurray expecting their accommodation to be paid for. This was true for some (particularly the skilled trades) but many did not get housing with their jobs and had to share a room for a $1000 month in sub-standard conditions. All forms of infrastructure creaked and cracked under the strain of a 25% population boom.

In any economic boom, you have your 'losers'. People were flocking to town expecting to strike it rich and of course not everyone can. I was working in Edmonton during the boom at a social agency. I had a call from a social worker in Fort McMurray asking if I could help a guy who saw it all go bad up there. The man was cabinet maker from Nova Scotia who had epilepsy. He tried his hand as a heavy equipment operator. But once he had a grand maul seizure behind a rather expensive piece of equipment he was blacklisted throughout town and his driver’s license was taken away. Someone who has no resources just can’t make a living as a dishwasher in Fort McMurray because of the high rents. He had to come back to Edmonton. He was able to succeed in Edmonton, since rents were lower and he could actually make a living as a dishwasher. In a town that is rich in money but short on any form of recreation, drugs and alcohol fills the gap for many people. This is another unfortunate reality of the boom.

Sustainable?
There are many people who question our need for fossil fuels and wonder if all this drilling and mining is sustainable for the planet. Many new technologies are in development that will decrease our reliance on fossil fuels. Unlike traditional drilling, oil sands require a very high capital cost. So a lot of money is being spent to develop this resource. The pace of development was incredible when oil prices climbed towards 150 USD/barrel. Prices are now at around 40. The development in the oil sands screeched to a halt. Current operations are still ongoing but new developments have all been shelved. Does it make sense to develop a resource that relies so heavily on commodity prices? Can this resource sustain an economy that is dependent on it? With all the problems outlined, should we continue to invest millions into something in which the negatives may outweigh the positives?

This was not an exhaustive list of problems. Indeed, much has been written about the problems the oil sands have created. I haven’t even touched on the role of government in this resource. This article sets up the discussion. My next article will discuss the positives of oil sands development. I hope you enjoyed reading this rather large article (I don’t think I’ve written something this long since University!) and stay tuned for the next one.

Oil Sands vs Tar Sands - Introduction

I posted a series of 3 blogs on the Oil Sands at www.titulia.com back in February of March this year. I origanily wrote this for an international audience, so it might seem basic to some.

Canada is a big country and Alberta is just one province . Some of you might not even know it exists. But lately Alberta has been receiving a lot of press. There has been a National Geographic article about it, several books, newspaper ads and other media campaigns as well a lot of lobbying in Ottawa and Washington and beyond. The oil sands are located in the North West corner of this province. The activity is centred around a town called Fort McMurray. This area isn't considered Northern Canada yet, but its still pretty isolated. Until recently. If you are unsure what the oil sands are, I recommend taking a look at the wikipedia article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athabasca_Oil_Sands . This will give you a better idea of the scope of this article and why it is becoming contentious.

I was born in Alberta. I was raised here. My father earned a living from the petrochemical industry. I have traveled across the country and around the world. Alberta is still home. I work for the provincial government as a career counselor. I am not expert on this issue, but I have looked at both sides of the debates fairly extensively. As an Albertan, I have a stake in this issue. As this becomes an international issue I think it is important for Albertans to discuss this maturely on the world stage. There is a lot of attention turning onto Alberta and we need to be ready to answer some sticky questions.

The oil and gas industry has been key part of the Alberta economy since 1947. Natural gas still forms the bulk of our energy exports. But the oil sands have grabbed a lot of attention. It is one of the most extensive and accessible petroleum reserves world left in the world. It lies in a country with very stable political structures. Canada is only a country of 33 million people (with over a territory stretching over 9 million sq km) but it lies right beside a country with over 300 million. Regardless of the green movement, we are still going to need petroleum products for the medium term future. Perhaps we'll need less, but we're still going to need it. The oil and gas industry is a part of Alberta culture and it makes this province one of the richest in Canada.

There is right now a war of terminology going on between oil sands vs. tar sands. For those promoting the development of this resource, they call it oil sands, because that is basically was bitumen is - oil stuck in dirt. For those against the development, they like to call it tar sands - tar is a very ugly and noxious substance. It is dangerous, its not something you ever want to touch. But it is man made, it cannot occur naturally. So for the sake of this article, I am going to use the term oil sands to describe this resource. Perhaps this exposes my bias too prominently, but we all have bias. I'm just not going to make you drink it(neither my opinion or the bitumen).

I am going to write 2 more parts to this article. One will be the negative consequences of digging (and drilling) for the oil sands. There has been quite a bit written about the negatives, but I'll do my best to sum up the arguments. The second part will be the positives of oil sands development. Some might see this as Alberta government propaganda, but this my point of view, the Alberta government has taken no part in the commissioning of this article. Besides, I'm so far down the gov't totem pole that I have to walk to work. If needed, I'll end this series off with a conclusion.

I don't have a lot of references to give you. Most of my knowledge is gained by the daily media (The CBC, Edmonton Journal, Globe and Mail, National Post and sometimes CTV when I'm bored). Here is a website with a positive spin on the subject: http://www.oilsandsdiscovery.com/oil_sands_story/story.html . Here is a website from the nay side: http://www.tarsandswatch.org/ . Both were located through a Google search so I cannot endorse either website. But this allows the reader to gain perspective on both sides of the issue.